Pantheon: Just Brad has Fallen May 4, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
Tags: Brad McQuaid
Money is always an issue.
This link was sent to me by Kaderre and I am starting to see it pop up in a few other places, so I will add it to the tale of Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen. The central quote in the post:
The money- It’s widely agreed upon by all parties that this project took in roughly 145 thousand dollars. A large chunk of that money, 35k, came from a single individual who promised another couple hundred thousand once he cleared it with his trust. Brad was having personal problems at the time and needed to take a cash advance from the project. He took roughly three months pay in advance which equaled roughly 38% of the funds that were left. Brad thought the rest of the money would come in, but the trust supervisor declined without even looking into the project.
-Over in the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen forums on Rerolled.
Basically, the fear of donating to a failed Kickstarter that cannot make critical mass continues to bear itself out. Well that and those who had a low opinion of Brad will feel vindicated in their belief. This looks like a bullet in the head for the game at this point, what with Brad making sure he got paid first and apparently valuing himself as worth $220K a year in a company in start-up mode.
As the news cycle goes, one day up on a forum, next up on Reddit, and the next after that it will be on the gaming news sites. Look for a fun comment thread over at Massively soon.
Pantheon: Mostly Fallen… for Now April 14, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, Kickstarter
A few weeks back I took a look at the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen and the state of affairs since it failed to meet its goal on Kickstarter.
I was particularly interested in how crowd funding would work in and environment where there was no critical mass to achieve. My guess was that people would feel differently about just handing money over versus pledging money in a system where it would not be taken unless some minimum value was achieved.
The Kickstarter campaign was pledged $460,657 from 3,157 potential backers. As of last night the post-Kickstarter campaign stood a this:
That is half as many people pledging, and they are pledging almost a third less per person than during the Kickstarter campaign. And the numbers have not been growing substantially since shortly after the Kickstarter ended, which lead to this announcement on the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen site yesterday.
In the past few months we have seen some of the most passion bubble up from the Internet than we have in some time; all for an idea of a game we all want to see happen. It has been an exciting time for all of us.
Over the first month of development through crowdfunding, we’ve been able to achieve what was needed to be done in order to gain investor interest. That is, we’ve shown there is interest in a game like Pantheon, we’ve built the term sheets and business plan, and now have a prototype we can show to potential investors.The downside now is that our initial resources have depleted, which regrettably means that development is going to slow down until finances can be secured. It’s not something we want to do by any means, but as we cannot guarantee paychecks to the team, they each need to be able to spend time on other things to pay the bills.Once we’re able to get that level of funding we can then secure much-needed studio space and be able to pick up the pace of production dramatically. We are deeply thankful to this community for getting Pantheon to this critical point, where we have been able to put together an attractive package to present to potential investors.
In the interim, any donations made at this point until further notice will be going directly to maintaining the website during this phase, and not towards development.
So there it sits. You can now donate to keep the web site functioning while they seek further financing, but work on the actual game has pretty much ceased. I suppose one must commend them for honesty, but it does make it difficult to see how Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen will progress from here. A failed Kickstarter campaign followed by an unsuccessful attempt to crowd fund directly cannot be helping their case.
Is this the end for the game?
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen a Month Past Kickstarter March 24, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, Kickstarter
It has been 30 days since the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter campaign came to a close.
In its 40 day run, the campaign managed to drum up $460,657 in pledges from 3,157 potential backers. While shy of the $800,000 target of the campaign, that is still a fair amount of cash to have been pledged. We tend to hear about things like Torment or Project Eternity, which brought in millions of dollars, but Kickstarter is full of little campaigns for $10,000 or less. According to Kickstarter, projects that raise $100,000 or more represent just 2% of successful campaigns.
Basically, raising close to half a million dollars is a pretty decent achievement. If the target of the campaign had been $500,000, we might even now be speaking of a successful campaign and stretch goals and, if not Chris Robert’s levels of post campaign funding, then maybe at least Lord British levels. Shroud of the Avatar has managed to rake in post campaign donations to the tune of nearly 50% of what they raised in that first 30 days.
But the campaign was not a success. The 40 day run wound up with Brad McQuaid and his team getting no money from Kickstarter. So the question quickly became, “Where do they go from here?” There was talk of relaunching another Kickstarter campaign a bit further down the road. That would address some of the errors made early on in the initial campaign, like the whole “Hey, surprise! We have a Kickstarter campaign without any real press build up!” aspect.
The choice that was eventually made was to self-fund raise. You can head on over to the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen web site and pledge money to the project. Well, give money to the project. This isn’t Kickstarter any more. You let go of your money the moment you click the final button. There are no goals to meet or critical mass to achieve.
That last bit seemed like an important tidbit to me. There is an aspect of “we’re all in this together” when it comes to Kickstarter, where success means a lump sum for the team and failure means nobody gets billed. It protects the early enthusiast from handing over his money too soon, only to find out that the project isn’t popular enough.
So I was curious to see how well Pantheon would do once it lacked that aspect of the Kickstarter campaign. As of this morning, donations to the project are:
That’s not… bad. Those numbers would still put the project in the top 2% when it comes to Kickstarter.
But it is also less than half the supporters and roughly a third of the money pledged at the end of the Kickstarter campaign.
So what happened?
Is this a failure of communication? I am not sure how Kickstarter works when your campaign does not fund. Are you allowed to continue doing updates to the project, or is it closed down hard? Because the last update was at the end of the project, 30 days back, and nothing since. If you missed that terminal “you can now give us money at our site” update, you might think things are done. And it is pretty much a reality of the universe that some percentage of a group won’t get the message no matter how directly you send it out.
Is it the missing Kickstarter aspect of the fundraising that is holding things back? Does being on Kickstarter give not only more exposure but also an adding sense of legitimacy?
Did the fact that campaign failed to hit its goal turn a bunch of people away from the campaign?
Or is this a matter of reality striking home, where we are no longer being asked to pledge to a funding effort that may or may not come to pass but being asked to part with actual coin of the realm in pursuit of the stated project goals?
Is PvP a Requirement for All MMOs? February 24, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, EverQuest, EverQuest II, MMO Design, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, World of Warcraft.
One of my gripes about the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter campaign was about PvP.
PvP was a stretch goal, but I was annoyed that it was on the list in any form at all. The promise of Pantheon seemed, to me at least, to be getting back to a difficult and dangerous PvE world that required grouping to take on. The early days of EverQuest were invoked in this regard. For a game being made by a small team that declared it was not trying to be “all things to all people,” the mention of PvP seemed like a step in that very direction.
And you should not get me wrong on this. I am not saying there shouldn’t be PvP. I play EVE Online, right? But does every PvE focused game need to spend time developing a PvP mechanism as well?
Going back to the dawn of the first massive successes on the MMO front, Ultima Online was PvP from day one. But EverQuest was derived from TorilMUD which had no PvP at all. In fact, the dev staff at TorilMUD split over the idea of PvP, which the PvP faction moving off to follow their dreams with Duris MUD. But SOE eventually felt that EverQuest needed PvP and so the Rallos Zek server was born.
This moved was widely viewed as a way to concentrate all the griefers into a single thunderdome where they would leave the rest of the player base alone. It was successful, in that the investment was low (as far as I can tell SOE did very little explicitly for PvP and was pretty hands off when it came to running the server) and it scratch that PvP itch for those who had to have it in a Norrathian context. (Roll stock footage of Fansy the Famous Bard.) And this lives on today as the Zek server with its own PvP rule set.
Asheron’s Call also had a PvP flagging system and a PvP dedicated server as part of its mix. So the big generation clearly bought into PvP, as did the next round of games. Dark Age of Camelot was explicitly PvP and Star Wars Galaxies had a sandbox PvP aspect to it.
Then came World of Warcraft, which had PvP and PvP servers from day one. Granted, day one was pretty ad hoc when it came to PvP, but Blizzard has a long history with RTS games, so players fighting other players must have seemed a natural to them. And whether or not you like the various stages WoW PvP has progressed through, it has been pretty successful. It would be hard to imagine WoW without it.
Of course, WoW also ran into one of the problems with PvP in a heavily PvE game, that of gear and ability balance between the two. It is really cool that the rogue in your dungeon group or raid can crowd control an off-mob with a stun lock, but I don’t know anybody who likes having that done to them by a rogue in a battleground. And Dark Age of Camelot ran into similar issued from the other direction, by introducing powerful PvE acquired gear into a primarily PvP game.
So mixing PvE and PvP is rarely a matter of a flagging system or a separate server. The eternal balance of equipment and abilities… which is already nettlesome in just the PvE environment… takes on an even bigger role when PvP is part of the mix. It doesn’t come for free, it requires design and development time… unless you take the approach SOE did with EverQuest and just try to ignore the whole PvP aspect of the balance thing, or you take the Guild Wars approach and just keep the two as separate as possible.
And after WoW, things just got went down hill. The success of the game meant other companies trying to copy WoW features in order to capture WoW numbers. EverQuest II is probably the most tragi-comic example of this. So much development and design time has been spent on PvP ideas in that game that it just about breaks your heart. They have had PvP servers, PvP arenas where you fight with a special sub-avatar of your character, arenas where you fight with your actual character, and, more recently, WoW-like battlegrounds. And the trend has always been that either the PvP is so bad that nobody uses it or that it is so affected by PvE stats and abilities that a whole array of special rules and exceptions have to be put in place to try to maintain at least some illusion of balance. The last time I checked in, SOE had gotten to the point where every piece of equipment and every ability essentially had two sets of stats, one for PvE and one for PvP, leading to some of the largest tool tip windows known to man.
Then there was Lord of the Rings Online, which couldn’t bring itself to allow the elf-on-elf combat we all secretly desire (we need more kinslayings) but which felt it had to have PvP, so they gave us Monster Play, a feature convoluted enough that I couldn’t even tell you how it works because I have never once used it. And I have tried the various PvP options on every MMO I have played. I know somebody loves Monster Play out there… you can find somebody who loves and will defend any MMO feature ever… but was LOTRO as a whole made better by it? Could the time spent on that have been better invested?
Warhammer Online at least never had the PvE vs. PvP balancing problem, because I don’t think most of us stuck around long enough for it to be a problem. Instead, it was bit by the WoW battleground bug, which became the most efficient way to level up, so everybody did those while the open world content languished for want of the numbers needed to make it viable.
And so it goes. Even today we are looking at The Elder Scrolls Online coming out in a little over a month. This is an MMO based on an exclusively single player RPG franchise… PvE to its deepest roots… and they are busying pushing the Alliance War, the PvP aspect of the game. Meanwhile, Star Wars: The Old Republic, an MMO made in the BioWare mold… fourth pillar and all that… has its Galactic Starfighter battleground out and available to everybody now.
Which brings me around to the title of this post. Is PvP a requirement for all MMOs? Can you even launch a PvE MMORPG without an announced PvP plan?
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter Campaign Winds Down February 22, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, Kickstarter
The Kickstarter for Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen finished up earlier today.
While there was a surge of pledges at the end, the final total came in at $460,657, well shy of the $800,000 goal. (But about where I predicted back on January 1st.)
The daily numbers ended up looking like this according to Kicktraq:
With that result, Visionary Realms and Brad McQuaid are now moving into a new dimension of crowd funding, going it alone and asking for donations. Their site is up and ready to take PayPal.
As I mentioned in yesterday’s post, going that route really changes, to my mind, the whole funding dynamic. There is no minimum threshold for funding. You pledge and they have your cash. And while that has worked well for other games, Star Citizen has gone insane in it post-Kickstarter financing and even Lord British has managed to come up with another million for Shroud of the Avatar, I am not sure how things will play out in the absence of successful Kickstarter campaign.
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen – Kickstarter and Beyond February 21, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, Kickstarter
Well, here we are with about a day left to go and the Kickstarter campaign for Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen is well shy of its $800,000 funding goal. At this late date I think we can all agree that the project would need a Kickstarter Christmas miracle to fund.
A look at Kicktraq this morning shows the last 24 hours of the campaign faces a hill… well, a mountain… representing 46% of the funding goal.
And so it goes.
The campaign has been a mixed bag. On the downside, I think that the groundwork done by Brad McQuaid and his Visionary Realms team before they set off down the Kickstarter path was woefully inadequate. One does not simply *something something* into Kickstarter.
I also think (based on my 2014 prediction) that they asked for too much money. I know that the idea was to set the groundwork for other funding by showing that the project had legs, but asking for $500K and getting it (which I think they could have) would have been better than asking for $800K and not getting much beyond the half way point. There is also a tipping point after you hit your goal where you can open things up to other funding sources.
And I remain concerned about the focus of the project. A key statement early on was that this was not going to be an attempt to be all things to all people. But seeming acquiescence by Brad, both in the project stretch goals and the Reddit AMAs, to a variety of things I would consider out of scope for an initial release made me wonder if they could keep things on a single track. The problem in software development never involves with coming up with ideas. The problem is always paring things down to essentials so that the team can deliver quality.
But all was not bad.
I think that the overall message is one that a select group of players wanted to hear. I think there is room in the world for a niche MMORPG focused on grouping and group content in the TorilMUD and EverQuest tradition. (Though I had to walk away from forum discussions when the “EQ PvP, Best PvP” squad hunkered down to stay. Absolutely the wrong group of players for this, in my opinion.)
I think Brad handled the Reddit AMA’s well, aside from a couple of “I don’t see why not” answers to things I felt were really out of scope. (I will not get off the focus wagon, will I?) There were a lot of good answers to question about views and details about Pantheon. But I think the whole thing was best served by his answers around Vanguard, what happened there, and how things are being run differently with Pantheon.
And, finally, I think that the cross-promotion between Pantheon and Shroud of the Avatar that came at the halfway point of the campaign was brilliant. That was a really slick idea to find the cross-over appeal between two different projects.
Of course, once that was in play, any number of people wanted to know if Brad could work a similar deal with Chris Roberts to maybe get a boost from his Star Citizen funding success. I am not sure that would see the same sort of overlap of interests as Shroud of the Avatar and Patheon: Rise of the Fallen, and it did not seem likely to come about in any case.
In the end though, it wasn’t enough.
Aside from looking for an angel investor, what now?
Well, it looks like Visionary Realms is going to take on the funding effort themselves. They have updated their web site and have announced their post-Kickstarter plans.
And there are some advantages to going this route. They are not beholden to Kickstarter and do not have to give them a cut. They are not hemmed in by a time limit. They can offer a wider variety of funding options. Even now Visionary Realms has a subscription option listed with special benefits.
So the funding effort goes on.
The question is, will it have the same impact?
Despite the occasional pedantic view on the subject, the goal of funding efforts like this are not to obtain 100% of the money required to complete the project. The idea is to get enough initial funding to demonstrate that there is interest in your project so that you can get further investment. Brad McQuaid has said as much about Pantheon.
So Kickstarter is a funding exercise in part, but even more a marketing exercise. But if you fail the funding part of Kickstarter, how much is the marketing exercise constrained? And even if a company can turn around and go do their own fundraising effort post-Kickstarter, will that have the same impact?
And, the biggest question for me, how long will it take Visionary Realms be able to catch up to where they left off with Kickstarter and will people be as willing to pledge? Because they have lost a few valuable assets that Kickstarter provides.
The first is, of course, the Kickstarter name itself. People have a range of opinions about Kickstarter and the wisdom of giving people money through it, but they know what Kickstarter is and as a service it seems reasonably well respected. There will be no Kickstarter cachet to bring people to the table any more.
Then there is the time limit aspect of the campaign. While Visionary Realms won’t make their goal in the time frame, I would be willing to bet that the mere fact that there was a time limit got people to pledge. There is nothing like a deadline to get people to focus. Campaigns that succeed, or which are close to success, often have a large surge of pledges at the last minute.
Now though, there is no time limit. There is no boundary to make people get off the fence one way or another. I suspect that will hurt funding in the short term.
And then there is what I will call, for lack of a better term, the “Kickstarter Deal.” In the case of Brad McQuaid and Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, the deal was that if he could raise $800,000, he would make this game happen. You can believe him or not, but that was what he was offering. So I put up some money along with about 3,000 other people. But the effort will fall shy of the mark, so none of us will end up paying out any money. Our pledge cost us nothing because the threshold for funding… the threshold at which Brad said he could make it happen… was not met.
Now that threshold is gone.
If I go over to the Visionary Realms web site and pledge $100 they have it that day, and if nobody else pledges I have just wasted my money. It is much easier to throw in some cash if you think you are part of a group that will meet the threshold for funding. But in the absence of that, I am probably not going to rush out on day one to give them some cash. I am much more likely to sit on my hands, to wait and see how things are going, before I think about donating.
While Kickstarter does not in anyway guarantee that a funded project will actually do what it says in the end, it does at least give the illusion of a concentration of pledges that, if a pre-determined threshold is met, will make the project possible. Unless I am missing something here, going to self-funding removes that aspect of the campaign.
So there we stand. The Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter will run out the clock in less than a day and will not meet its goal.
Did you pledge any money to the Kickstarter and will you, in turn, donate to the self-run funding campaign for the project?
Is this the beginning of the end, or just the end of the beginning?
Pantheon Falling – A Desperate Plan B February 13, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
I cannot say that I find this all that encouraging for the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter.
VR is Visionary Realms, his company, and not some other virtual reality venture as I initially hoped.
An Angel Investor is somebody willing to invest with a very high amount of risk. As the next step after failing to successfully crowd fund a project… and Brad was using crowd funding to demonstrate that the project had sufficient support to be worth investing in… it smacks of desperation. Well, it does when you put it out there on Twitter.
Of course, the project has not failed to crowd fund yet. There are still nine days left to go. But the numbers look grim. The mini chart at Kicktraq tells the tale.
With nine days left to go, the project is not even at the half way point of funding. And the total needed to be raised each and every day now stands at close to $46,000. The most raised in a single day to this point has been just over $42,000, with the average per day standing at just $12,000.
So there needs to be a really REALLY big finish for this to be a success.
Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Half-time Report February 2, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, Shroud of the Avatar.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, Kickstarter, Lord British
Not the Super Bowl half-time.
No, we have now reached Day 20 of the 40 day Kickstarter campaign for Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen. It is half way through its run.
And looking at the raw numbers this morning, you might feel justified in some skepticism about whether the campaign will reach its goal. Things currently stand at:
Half way through and not quite at the 40% mark. In a lot of campaigns that would be a serious cause for concern. Kicktraq shows that the average pledge per backer is $131 and that the average pledged per day stands at $14,876, well shy of the $20,000 a day required to make the goal.
But this campaign isn’t unfolding in the smooth, inverted bell curve way that I described in an earlier post, the way that Camelot Unchained and Shroud of the Avatar did. That it is different can be seen as something of a mixed bag.
First there was the campaign launch, which was preceded by very little fanfare. This turned what might have been a psychologically useful big first day into a scramble to catch up and get the word out. And while the work on that has been going apace, it would have been nice to point at a big opening day for that.
The campaign did get a couple of boosts. The first came when SOE announced that Vanguard: Saga of Heroes would be shut down this summer. If nothing else, that seemed to answer the musical question, “Why would I want this new thing when I am happy enough with Brad’s past work?” That past work is going away.
Then there was the Reddit Ask Me Anything that Brad got through pretty well. Those can be tough runs. I recall the first one John Smedley did, where he had to go through the whole Star Wars Galaxies NGE thing again, along with a few other unfun episodes in SOE history. If anything, I think the questions that Brad got were not tough enough. There was a lot of fanboy questions about this feature or that and a couple about Vanguard and what happened at Sigil. But he has that last down to a nice sound bite at this point, so it was a lot more kumbaya than inquisition.
I would have liked to have heard… and would still like hear… a run through by him about the evolution of EverQuest from its roots to today. He wants to get back to the old school days of 1999, dispensing with the new crap. (For me, “new crap” is pretty much defined as “everything after Ruins of Kunark,” which was the only truly all good MMO expansion ever, in my rose tinted view of the world.) But EverQuest didn’t change and evolve in a vacuum. Things were done for reasons, and often to solve specific problems. I would like to hear how Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen will handle this. (And I don’t think “smaller audience” is a sufficient answer.)
And then there was the latest item to get out the pledges, a tie-in with Lord British’s Shroud of the Avatar: Forsaken Virtue. If you support both projects at a specific level or higher… and you can still get in on Shroud of the Avatar, Lord British is past the $3 million mark… you will receive a cloak in each game with that features the crest of the other.
That is a nifty incentive. But the real win for Pantheon is that it included a direct message from Lord British to all 27,000+ supported of Shroud of the Avatar about the Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen Kickstarter campaign. That is some serious targeted marketing, getting the word out to that many nostalgia focused gamers. And while the cross-over between Ultima fans and EverQuest fans won’t be anywhere close to 100%, even a 10% hit rate would do wonders for Brad’s funding effort.
So that is a big wildcard that won’t be fully played until we get to the final days of the campaign. There is almost always a spike in pledges at the end, which can be all the more frantic if it looks like a last minute push can be make or break. We shall see.
And I also wonder if there isn’t more to the talks between Brad and Lord British. Only a fool would pin all his hopes on a single throw of the dice on Kickstarter, and I do not think Brad is a fool. Could Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen end up under the Portalarium banner next to Shroud of the Avatar? That seems like a long shot, but it would make Portalarium more of an adventure game nostalgia power house. We shall see. We still have 20 more days to go.
January in Review January 31, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, EVE Online, Month in Review, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, World of Warcraft.
Tags: Feedly, WordPress.com
This month I’ll ramble on a bit about Feedly. With the demise of Google Reader, Feedly is where I ended up in my search for an online RSS feed reader. It isn’t perfect. It isn’t even as good as Google Reader was before Google+ came along. But it is close enough to the post-Google+ version of Google Reader that I am okay with it. I even opted in for Feedly Pro, which at this point only buys me a search field, but other things are promised for the future. And I appear to need that search field. Who are you bloggers who do not have any sort of search function available on your blogs? (Looking at Liore, amongst a cast of dozens.)
Anyway, it fills my basic needs, even if it appears to hate how WordPress.com formats pictures, appearing to toss them around in a fit of pique and sundering them from their captions when my posts are viewed. And there is much I do not know, or have not noticed about the service. For example, the other day Tobold was chuckling about how Feedly was attempting to prove what we all secretly believe, that he and SynCaine are the same person and just trolling us all on a grand scale. Laugh while you can! Somebody will prove it some day!
But I was wondering about Feedly recommending feeds, which he noted. It doesn’t do that for me, though that might be because I have it set in the most minimalist form I could manage. I don’t need anything fancy or pictures or a book format or anything. I have FlipBoard for that. I just want a list of titles to run through. And I also saw in his screen shot… such a rare thing on his blog that we all should stop and gape (pro tip: png format for text like that, as JPEG will blur.)… that it also showed the number of people who are subscribed various feeds. So, of course, I had to go find out how many people on Feedly were subscribed to mine.
That is actually a lot more than I would have guessed. So much more that I suspect that the number is wrong. I certainly would have put the number far lower. Not that the number is huge. Look what Massively has on Feedly.
Still, if it is correct, I guess I am not faring too badly. And I am doing a bit better than some on Feedly.
Ah well, I can make Mittens feel better about that one.
I bring this up not only because it is something to ponder… though that would be reason enough… but also because it pokes a big hole in WordPress.com’s stats page. Theoretically, WordPress.com tells me how many page views I get on the site and, if I go into detail on a single post, how many people saw it through syndication. Back in the days of Google Reader, the ratio of site to syndication views was at least 3 to 1 in favor of RSS feeds. Checking recent posts, that ratio has swung in favor of on-site views, with the ratio having move to something like 2 to 1 in that direction. And believe me, the numbers listed for syndicated views are nowhere close to the alleged number of followers that Feedly pegs me at. So something, somewhere is amiss. The usual state of affairs in the universe I suspect.
I am also curious about where those little hash tag entries come from for feeds and why I only get two.
One Year Ago
Wizardry Online joined the SOE stable while Pirates of the Burning Sea was sent packing. Who is laughing now?
In EVE Online, after a sudden burst of war fever died down, there was a surprise battle where more than 2,500 ships clashed in Asakai when CFC FC Dabigredboat lead a supercap fleet in to rescue a stray titan. The battle was so big that CCP did a Dev Blog about it. Meanwhile, we were to be denied LEGO Rifters.
Path of Exile went into full open beta as well.
There was a list of 20 games that defined the Apple II.
Five Years Ago
Five years ago I was in a Middle-earth mood. I had rolled up some new characters on the same server as a few notable podcasters and then started trying to catch up to them. The small and friendly community in LOTRO helped out, so I was able to do the Great Barrow with a pickup group and not feel the need to drink heavily afterward. Of course, I sometimes feel the need to stir the pot. And then there was the whole icon thing.
I also mentioned something that involved punching Amy Tan that seemed to go down well. According to Google, this was the only site it tracks that has ever used the exact phrase “punch Amy Tan.” I think it is still pretty much a TAGN unique.
I went looking for KartRider and found that after beta Nexon apparently folded up that tent and called it a day, at least here in the US.
I noticed that the optical drive on our Wii started making a lot of noise. It still makes noise five years later, but it also still works.
There was that whole controversy about Wikipedia deleting entries on MUDs and MUD history. That lead to the creation of MUD History Wiki over on Wikia. Many MUDs are still alive and well, and sites like the MUD Connector seem to still thrive.
I pointed to a post over at Massively that showed the top selling games for October of 2008 were almost all a couple years old or more.
I hit the 1,000 post mark, which was cause for yet another milestone post and some reflection. (I’m past the 3,000 mark a now and I’ll probably hold off on more reflection until the 5,000 mark, so you’re safe for a while.)
Oh, and I predicted a whole bunch of crap that mostly failed to materialize. But that didn’t stop me from trying again this year.
And, like everybody else, I had a laundry list for the new President. He totally failed on all fronts!
New Linking Blogs
The following blogs have linked this site in their blogroll, for which they have my thanks.
Please take a moment to visit them in return.
Most Viewed Posts in January
- Eastasia Routed at B-R5RB! 70+ Titans Down!
- Running Civilization II on Windows 7 64-bit
- A Horrible Community…
- Bloodbath at SOE – Four Titles Closing Down, PlanetSide Goes F2P
- SOE All Access Changes… yet again… And the Future
- Did Blizzard Just Hint at the Warlords of Draenor Ship Date?
- Blizzard Isn’t Giving You a Free Copy of Reaper of Souls
- My MMO Outlook for 2014
- In Which We Have Always Been At War With Eastasia
- Quote of the Day – WoW, Legacy Raids, and The Squish
- The Malthusian Trap of HED-GP
- Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen and the Realities of Kickstarter Funding
Search Terms of the Month
nation pokedex all 705 caught
[And I thought 485 was bad]
mountain dew code red with vanilla ice cream
[been there, done that]
why are bond villains so stupid
[Their motivations are mostly mundane]
many talk porno blog
[loves you long time]
After starting off the month bitching and moaning about being bored in null sec and mostly tending my training queue in a station in high sec, the war in the south heated up. There was the big battle at HED-GP, which I avoided but which was worth writing about, and then the titan slaying festival at B-R5RB that I managed to sneak into towards the end of the fight. Quite the time. And then CCP pushed Rubicon 1.1 the next day, the bugs in which pretty much grounded null sec. Ah well, such is the way of things in New Eden. CCP will get it fixed, and that big fight will keep me subscribed for another six months. And while the big battle has turned the tide of the war, it still isn’t over yet.
World of Warcraft
The binge in Azeroth continued through January. I made a sky golem. I got a second character to level 90. I managed to get to exalted with a couple more factions in Pandaria. I actually did a raid via the raid finder, which I would have posted about had I understood a bit of what happened. I think it just reinforced the reason I am in a group that does five person content and not a raiding guild. Still, fun continues to be had in WoW.
Well, there is a bunch of stuff coming up, though I am not sure how much of it I will write about.
I probably won’t say anything about the SuperBowl.
While the launch fervor is building, I remain lukewarm about The Elder Scrolls Online. The minor flare up about the pre-order and collector’s edition hasn’t helped that at all. And by that, I mean that it didn’t make me care any more or less about the game.
EverQuest Next Landmark Minecraft, the part of the EverQuest Next story I don’t really care about, will go/has gone/might be into alpha today. Smed has cautioned those who paid to be there to remember that this is alpha. To his credit, he did say that SOE would offer refunds to people who didn’t like it. SOE always wants to do the right thing, it just takes them a few tries to get there some days.
The Kickstarter campaign for Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen will finish up before the end of next month. As of last night I would have guessed it wasn’t going to make it. It got a boost from the announcement that Vanguard was closing, and the Reddit AMA that Brad did helped things, but it didn’t look like either was going to be enough. And then there was the announcement that there would be a cross promotion with Lord British and Shroud of the Avatar. Support both and get something special. While I remain skeptical of the fickle nature of the fondness Lord British can show, this could help out a lot. Will that be enough? At this point there needs to be a really big finale for this campaign to fund.
While there is still a war on in EVE Online, the news seems to indicate that it might be winding down before too long. What will this mean to the three sided power structure in null sec?
Raptr sent me a summary of my year in gaming 2013 which actually surprised me. That’ll get a post.
Warlords of Draenor might go into beta… or might at least announce when beta will begin, which will likely start the 6 month count down to the go-live date. I still have to figure out which class to insta-level to 90. And then there will likely be more of the usual with the regular group in Azeroth.
Will Vanguard’s Closure Help Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen? January 27, 2014Posted by Wilhelm Arcturus in entertainment, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen, Sony Online Entertainment, Vanguard SOH.
Tags: Brad McQuaid, John Smedley, Kickstarter
On Friday afternoon SOE chucked a huge stone into the lake of MMOs, and now we are watching how the ripples spread and wondering what they will impact.
What does Friday’s blood letting say about SOE’s all-in attitude on free to play, or about one company running more than a couple of MMO titles? Should we avoid the niche titles from SOE and NCSOFT, as they appear vulnerable to closure at a whim compared to similar titles where that is all a given company has going for it? You seem safe playing in Norrath (on Windows) and in whatever the PlanetSide universe is called, but other titles… not so much. How long does the contract for the DC Universe Online IP go?
Will people who invested a lot in cosmetic gear in Clone War Adventures or Free Realms feel burned and thus be less likely to spend money now that these two cosmetic funded titles are being shut down with 9 weeks notice? Has SOE poisoned the well on this front? And what does Smed’s “no more titles for kids” pronouncement mean? I guess the myth that many MMO players were kids with daddy’s credit card has been dispelled.
Have we seen enough Asian MMOs ported to the US market only to languish and fade yet?
Can Smed be naive enough to believe that a vague promise to former Star Wars Galaxies players about SOE’s next, unannounced title being for them, that they can come “home,” means anything? I am sure that those driven out by the stick that was the NGE are pretty sure that their home is elsewhere these days. And as for those who remained, how many stuck with the game just because it was set in the Episodes IV-V era of Star Wars? Is a different IP going to scratch that itch?
And then there is Vanguard and Brad McQuaid and the kickstarter for his new game, Pantheon: Rise of the Fallen.
On the one hand, part of his “trust me” appeal for the Kickstarter campaign is his leadership in producing two enduring MMORPGs, EverQuest and Vanguard. Sure, Vanguard had a tough launch. That was just the situation at the time and he had to roll with it. But once it was “fixed,” the game was good.
So SOE “sunsetting” (Because that makes us all feel better than just saying “closing” or “shutting down” right?) Vanguard kind of puts a pin to the balloon of that argument. *POP*
Because if Vanguard was good enough, popular enough, and profitable enough, SOE wouldn’t have found security updates to be too difficult. Money talks, and enough money gets your fixes done. So we can assume there wasn’t enough.
So Brad now has one successful, still running MMO on his resume, even if it has been drastically changed from back in the day, and one that is being shut down… the announcement for which went out during his Kickstarter.
And then there was the talk about Brad buying Vanguard from SOE. Fine, I know a small crowd of fans were really for that, but for me that was a red flag moment. My concern for Pantheon, should it fund successfully, is that it will end up being another case of trying to do too much and ending up launching with an unready product. A small team really needs to pare down projects to the essentials to deliver. I still cringe that PvP is on the stretch goals, as that seems like a distraction, something totally outside of the vision set out for the game. And it doesn’t matter that they will likely not make it to that stretch goal, it is the fact that they even consider it an option that worries me.
So, in the middle of a campaign for a new game, sudden talk about buying up the old game seems like a moment where somebody should be saying in Brad’s ear, “Stay on target!”
On the flip side, I wonder if the timing of this announcement from SOE… delivered after lunch on Friday, the time slot chosen by PR people who hope the news will be too late to make a splash in the news cycle and will end up forgotten by Monday… might turn to something of a boon for the Pantheon Kickstarter campaign.
Certainly, there is the potential to get the news about the Kickstarter in front of a few more faces. The coverage of the closure of Vanguard inevitably rolls around to what Brad is up to now.
And Vanguard shutting down puts paid to some of the comments I have seen about the Pantheon up to this point, which basically amount to “Why do I want this when I already have Vanguard available?” Well, you won’t have Vanguard around for much longer.
Will these two points help boost the Kickstarter campaign? It currently sits at just over $238,000 of the $800,000 initial goal, with 26 days left to go. That seems like a lot, but pledges have fallen short of the daily minimum to make goal since the initial surge of support. So the campaign clearly needs a shot in the arm.
Can this news do the job? It looks like there was already a small uptick in people supporting the project over the weekend, and there is some sentiment about for supporting Pantheon as a replacement for Vanguard. But is it enough?