One of the quintessential promises of “the future” is the flying car. It is the stuff of legend, George Jetson had one, Kevin Smith made a film short about them, Blade Runner featured them, and we all want one.
And every so often an item shows up in the new announcing a Flying Car has been created.
But one look at it shows that it is not a flying car. Even the manufacturer does not call it a flying car.
No, this is a yet another case of the press going for sensation and/or clearly not understanding what they are reporting.
What we have here is an airplane you can drive on public streets. In the terminology of the manufacturer, a “roadable aircraft.” There have been a number of such designs over the years, including one based on the Ford Pinto.
And I am not down on the concept. If you are a pilot, having a plane you can drive home and park in the garage is a significant benefit. You could use it to commute via air without having to have multiple vehicles. You can also bypass the cost of having to hanger the aircraft.
But this is not the flying car, so shame on the media yet again for using that term in your headlines. I realize it is Summer, the slow news season, but still.
No, the flying car is something you or I could drive daily without requiring anything much more complicated than a drivers license.
Fortunately, NASA has been looking our for those of us futurists who long for the flying car. They have defined some guidelines for a real flying car, or personal air vehicle, so we’ll know when we get there. They have even funded some prize awards to stimulate research in that direction.
But today we’re still many miles away from the flying car.