The Federal Trade Commission Sues to Block Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard

It has been nearly 11 months since Microsoft’s bombshell announcement about signing a deal to acquire Activision Blizzard for almost $69 billion dollars.

XBox plus Activision Blizzard equals something

Since then there has been rumblings that somebody in the US or EU might challenge the merger and… the rumblings turned out to be true as the US Federal Trade Commission announced their intent to sue to block the merger.

Among the FTC’s mandates is to oversee such mergers to assure that they do not lead to monopolistic anti-competitive situations or unduly harm consumers, something that they have been spectacularly bad/naive about my entire life.  See the T-Mobile acquisition of Sprint where literally every promise made by T-Mobile to keep the deal from being blocked by the FTC was broken.

It seems unlikely that Microsoft and Activision aren’t lying hard enough.  They have been out promising that the swath of games they will soon control will be allowed on platforms like PlayStation or Steam.  But the FTC isn’t buying Microsoft’s reassurances… like maybe there is a history of anti-competitive practices there… and stated in their press release:

With control over Activision’s blockbuster franchises, Microsoft would have both the means and motive to harm competition by manipulating Activision’s pricing, degrading Activision’s game quality or player experience on rival consoles and gaming services, changing the terms and timing of access to Activision’s content, or withholding content from competitors entirely, resulting in harm to consumers.

If we have learned anything over the years, it is that a corporation’s promises are worthless without contractual weight behind them… and Microsoft was clearly already aware of the FTC’s interest, announcing a deal to keep Call of Duty on the Switch just this week in an attempt to build a case for itself.

And yes, I am swinging hard against Microsoft so far in this post, but I am conflicted on the whole deal.

Microsoft is, by all reports, a much better place to work that Activision Blizzard and it might be good to have a major studio like ActiBlizz, which has been facing so many problems with the state of California, cleaned up, something that will never happen with the current ActiBlizz management in place.  Literally every c-level exec needs to be cast out before there to be any change, and there are probably a good number of VPs and directors that should be on the list as well.

Of course, part of my conflict is that the one person who drives the culture at ActiBlizz, Bobby Kotick, is also the person who will benefit the most from this merger.  If the merger goes through all his sins will be rewarded with dump trucks full of cash… but if the merger does not go through, then he’ll just remain obscenely over-compensated while beating down unions that are only being proposed because of poor working conditions and compensation.

As such, Kotick is keen to reassure people that the deal is going through.

I wanted to provide a brief update on our pending merger with Microsoft. This week the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced its decision to challenge the deal. This means they will file a lawsuit to block the merger, and arguments will be heard by a judge.

This sounds alarming, so I want to reinforce my confidence that this deal will close. The allegation that this deal is anti-competitive doesn’t align with the facts, and we believe we’ll win this challenge.

As I may have suggested, facts are few and far between.  It is the potential for how the company could use the weight of its combined influence of XBox Live for PC and Console plus the titles like Call of Duty that they will control if this deal goes through.

So will the deal go through?

As much as I hate to agree with anything Bobby says, I strongly suspect the acquisition will be allowed.  In fact, I doubt the FTC has in mind any plan to actually stop the deal cold.  Instead, they will probably want some of the promises Microsoft is making to be legally mandated by an enforceable agreement, like not screwing over competing platforms by making all their titles exclusive to Microsoft channels, in order to acquiesce on the deal.

So that is my guess.  But we shall see.  A bit of a shake up in the status quo at least.  Something to distract us from whatever Elon Musk has been up to today.


4 thoughts on “The Federal Trade Commission Sues to Block Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision Blizzard

  1. Rumpshakah

    I would love to Bobby to not hit the marks he was required to and thereby ripping his parachute away – however in all honesty, I for one, back the purchase as it will make things better for all employees. I lifted my own personal boycott when the family of the girl who “committed suicide” dropped their charges.


  2. PCRedbeard

    I suspect that the EU will sue to block the acquisition as well, since they don’t have a dog in the fight in that neither Microsoft nor Acti-Blizz are an EU company. Likewise, they’ll take a similar tactic against acquisitions by Sony, because of the same thing. The EU is the lone entity to stand up to Apple and force them to change their charging port, so I suspect that they’ll do the same here.


  3. Wilhelm Arcturus Post author

    @PCRedbeard – Yeah, the EU’s dog in the fight is that they hate the fact that US companies dominate tech and want to tax them somehow. They keep trying to find a way to tax Google for sending traffic to local news sites.

    I suspect, however, that they won’t bother with Microsoft if the FTC extracts enough concessions. They haven’t been mad at them for a while.

    The power cable thing just seemed like spite given how many other connectors there still are out there in the world. I know I was pissed when I got a VW as a rental car and the power jacks in it were not USB standard ports, which I have cables for to support everything, but USB-C ports. Where is my justice?


  4. Esteban

    “…but if the merger does not go through, then he’ll just remain obscenely over-compensated while beating down unions that are only being proposed because of poor working conditions and compensation.”

    That’s the part which inspires an accellerationist reading of events wherein the merger failure would be a good thing. Those unionisation efforts at Activision Blizzard really have been avant-garde for the industry in the US, and two of them (Raven Software, and now GWA Albany) seem to have largely succeeded. Perhaps continued misery at Blizzard might inspire more of same.

    I’m wary of that whole mindset (people’s suffering as kindling for the fires of progress, etc.) but there’s least a silver lining.


Voice your opinion... but be nice about it...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s