Artwork provided by my daughter, who said it was okay to post despite our very sad Christmas Eve.
Everybody should have a happy holiday if they can.
Right now, I’m pretty bored with all games
-Mark Pincus, former Zynga CEO in a Wall Street Journal interview
On the one hand, his longing for the early days of FarmVille, to which he claimed to be “addicted,” is an understandable emotion, at least to me. I certainly long to relive the early excitement of some games.
On the flip side… really, FarmVille is the pinnacle of your gaming excitement?
But I think it is clear from his history that Mr. Pincus was looking for a way to make money in life, not a way to make games. I particularly like this old quote:
I did every horrible thing in the book, too, just to get revenues right away. I mean we gave our users poker chips if they downloaded this Zwinky toolbar which was like, I don’t know, I downloaded it once and couldn’t get rid of it
Well he made money and left his mark on an industry. I still wonder what Lord British thought we was getting into before Zynga pretty much fell apart.
Hat tip: Game Politics
Reblogging this to illustrate a WordPress.com feature that I am going to complain about in the next post. Picking on Tesh for his 600th post. Also, dice!
This is my 600th post. Seems like it ought to be an occasion of some sort. So let’s see… Dice, Rats and Dragons, Oh, My!
I’m doing a Kickstarter campaign for my “Rusty Fudge” Tinker Dice and their siblings (I have the numbered designs, fudge designs and a lead on metal and plastic printers). Yes, it’s not the BIG campaign for the playing card deck, but that’s still in the pipe, I’m just ramping up to it. In the meantime, there are a handful of reasons I’m doing the dice first. At least, once I get the last few bits of paperwork sorted out.
One, it’s smaller in scope ($3,000 primary goal), so I’m hoping it is fulfilled and then I can make sure I know how to make the whole process work, start to finish. It seems relatively straightforward… but that’s why I want to take…
View original post 693 more words
I am going to lump together a few things I have been looking for into a single post to see who recommends what in the hope that it might help break a log jam or two. Normally I save these sorts of “not quite gaming related” posts for the weekend, but I figured I would try to catch some of you bored at work on a Friday.
USB Headset Replacement
I have a five year old Plantronics .Audio 510 USB headset that performs very well. The sound is good and the mic boosts my very quiet voice so that people can actually hear it. And it kills background noise very well. Using it was a requirement when appearing on podcasts, back when I was getting invited to appear on podcasts.
And as a unit, it remains simplicity itself. One USB plug and you’re done.
The only problem with the whole thing is that they are a bit too small for my head in just about every dimension. I can wear them for an hour at a stretch no problem, but after that they start to annoy, irritate, and eventually hurt at about the three hour mark.
I replaced the Plantronics set with a Turtle Beach Ear Force X11 set a while back. The new set was very comfortable, I could wear it for hours on end. The mic was decent and sound was okay, even if connections were a bit more complex. It isn’t just a simple USB plug.
So I started using that at home while I brought the old set to work where having the USB powered mic helps with speech app work I do and lets people actually hear me on conference calls.
The problem is that the X11 has not proven to be a very durable unit, and less than two years down the road, the headset was coming apart, the mic was crackling (much to the annoyance of the rest of the instance group), and the volume adjust/mute fob on the cable was clearly on its last legs, feeling loose and likely to break at any moment when I used it.
So the X11 set had to go.
As a stop gap, I now drag the Plantronics set back and forth with me to work. But I would really like to get a headset that works as well and is as durable as the Plantronics. I would buy another one of the same model, except that they don’t make it any more (I am not buying used) and all of the new Plantronics models are different enough that I won’t buy them sight unseen. And, of course, there is no place I can go to try them on. I am not one of those people who can rip open sealed boxes at stores just to see if something fits, and my wife won’t return things to Fry’s for me.
So, I am looking for, high quality, durable, USB powered, headset with noise cancelling mic. Comfortable for fat-heads like me would be a bonus.
Video Editing Software Upgrade
Over the last couple of years now I have have created a few video for YouTube related to gaming. They have tended to be pretty simple Part of the reason for that was because simple was what I wanted; import video, trim video, add credits, add music, and upload to YouTube. But another part is that the video editing software I use, Windows Live Movie Maker is really geared towards simple. It doesn’t do much more than I have already done with it.
But now I feel I want to do more.
That means going out and spending some money on some better software.
However, within my budget, which is the ~$99 price range, there are a number of options, and choosing between them is hindered by my inability to articulate what the “more” I want to do really is. I’ve only been in the video editing kiddy pool so far, so I am not sure what the options really are. The only aspect I am pretty sure I don’t need is any high end audio editing, as I have a couple of such packages for doing just that sitting on my shelf already. Audio I do at work.
And, of course, I don’t wholly trust the end user reviews (when did shipping problems become a reason for a 1-star product rating?) or the glossy data sheets one finds at the company web sites. So if you used a video editing package in my price range and are happy (or even unhappy) with it, let me know.
Should I Sell My Soul to U-verse or Xfinity?
I think I have a quorum now that agrees that our seven year old DSL plan is not giving us the bandwidth we clearly need as a household. Basically, even my wife is complaining about interned speeds now, while my daughter thinks YouTube is a radio and streams videos just to listen to the music while she draws on her iMac.
Due to where we live… Silicon Valley FFS… I cannot just call up AT&T and ask them to boost my DSL package. I have all they offer for losers like me who dare live so far from their local CO.
So, to get a speed increase, I have to buy into one of the separate upgraded services. This leaves me with only two choices at my address, AT&T’s U-verse and Comcast’s Xfinity. Both can theoretically bring me an internet only upgrade, though I wouldn’t be surprised to find strings attached or other barriers in place.
The question is, which one to choose. Having the phone company on one hand and the cable company on the other is clearly a no-win situation. I have no love for either company, neither the reassembled AT&T deathstar nor the Comcast cable anaconda.
So the question probably is, which one will hurt me the least? I have heard bad tales about both running with “up to” bandwidth numbers that are nowhere near what you end up getting or that either company will screw you on bandwidth if you try to order without their TV package.
Thoughts and/or experiences with either service?
Anybody have any experience with devices like the Lag Buster that Cringely wrote about a while back?
And, to totally leave computers and electronics, is anybody else in the market for a new dog kennel… I mean a new mattress? My wife’s work and research has come up with the Simmons Beautyrest as the most likely candidate for us at this time. But to me, buying a mattress seems to be somewhere just behind buying a car in anxiety about making the wrong choice. The end result, in this case, is literally “you made your bed, now sleep in it!”
We recently finished refinancing our home again. It is part of the homeowner’s tradition in the US.
The dance is a little different these days. Back in 2006 when we bought the house, the loan company was happy enough to let me finance it 100% before we had even sold the old place. For a month or so I was in debt in the seven figure range. Do I get an achievement for that?
Since the boom, interest rates have come down. The last time we refinanced, the rate was low enough that we told the finance guy we work with that he would probably would only ever hear from us again via a yearly Christmas card.
And then rates went down even further, so that we could shave off more than a full percentage point from our rate, which in turn would peel a decent chunk of money off of our monthly payment. Some of that comes from resetting the 30 year clock and the fact that we have paid off a chunk of principle as well, but the low rate helps too.
Getting documentation together took more effort this time around, all the more so because I had been self-employed for the last couple of years. I had to document where all the money came from since 2010. The years of really easy money are over. It is back to the way it was in 2000 or so, and then some. But we managed it.
The whole refinancing effort culminates in the signing “ceremony” at the title company. You go sit in a conference room with your loan guy and a title company representative and sign all the documents the loan company wants you to sign. The title company verifies this, tells the loan company you have jumped through all of their hoops, gets the money, pays off your old loan, and gives you whatever is left over. That is pretty much how escrow works.
We had our daughter in tow this time around, and while I had the iPad handy for her to play with, she wanted to sit and watch what we were doing. So I asked her to count how many times I had to sign my name during the process.
The answer: More than 60 times.
That number includes pages I just had to initial. For every multi-page document, I had to initial each page and then sign the final page.
But given my scrawl of a signature, writing out my initials takes about as much effort as signing something.
Some of it was the usual stuff. The multi-page document with all of the loan details. The special document with the interest rate, which includes an explanation of how interest rates work, for people who missed it in the previous document. The line in the notary ledger. The detailed list of where all the money was going.
Some of it though was kind of silly. I had to sign no fewer than three documents that basically said that the house being financed was my primary residence. There were a few cases of signing documents that seemed to have the same purpose as some other document. And at one point I had to sign a photocopy of a signed document I had submitted on a previous occasion in order to verify that I had indeed signed it.
My wife had to sign and initial nearly as many documents. There were a few just for me, but she was still over the 50 mark.
This is what happens when you make people accountable for their practices. They make you sign a bunch of forms to “prove” that they have done everything required by law, whether or not you know the law or the relevance of any given document. I recall back when a federal regulation came out saying that doctors could not share you medical history without your express written consent. At my next visit to the doctor, I had to sign a form authorizing the doctor to share my medical history with whomever he damn well pleased or they would simply refuse to treat me.
That is how it always plays out.
Anyway, during a lull in the signing, I asked the woman from the title company if I could ask her a stupid question.
She laughed and asked me if I wanted to know why I had to sign so many documents.
I said no, my question was much sillier. Besides which, I have worked at big companies, I know about papering over processes with documents and signatures to CYA.
What I wanted to know was why title companies seemed to be staffed entirely by women.
This was my sixth or seventh time to the title office for signing papers in my lifetime, and I could not recall there ever being a man working in any of them.
At this point our loan guy said he hadn’t actually noticed that in all his years of hanging out at title companies, but that in hindsight I seemed to be right.
The woman from the title company told us that, basically, the job involves getting yelled at a lot. Pompous real estate agents, shady loan officers, cranky buyers, they all seem to target the title company staff when things aren’t going right or closing fast enough or what not. She said that they do get men in the office from time to time, but that they do not have the temperament for that sort of thing, so do not last very long.
At least that was her theory. And it certainly has some merit.
Based on what she said, I suspect that pay enters into it as well.
In financial organizations, the people who actually do the customer facing work tend to be paid poorly. Go ask a bank teller how much they make. This, along with the fact that she said that the sales end of the business (where commissions come into play) and management over a certain level (where the pay is good) were heavily staffed with men makes me think that, among the things she and her colleagues have to put up with, mediocre compensation might very well be on the list.
But I did not say the part about pay aloud. That is just my theory.
And my sample set is just title offices in Silicon Valley, so it could be a regional thing.
Anybody out there with title company insight that can confirm or deny my theory?
No chilly New Year’s Eve for us!
Happy new year from a sunny, warm location. Back to colder weather tomorrow, at which point I’ll think about what passes for new year’s predictions around here.