Off the usual path of computers and video games today, but today, November 22, 2023, is the 60th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, something that was an incredibly important and history altering event for my parents generation. I still have a copy of the afternoon edition of the local Mountain View paper from that day.
That paper was in among my late grandmother’s things when we were cleaning out her house. I assume she saved it due to the headline, though one of her daughters, my aunt, who was in middle school at the time, had a poem published on the back page of that edition as well. That might have been more important to her in hindsight.
For many this assassination seemed to change the course of history. It was rumored that Kennedy did not want to get mired in Vietnam, that he was going to pull out advisors and not get involved, a direction, in hindsight, that would have spared both the US and Vietnam much pain.
And, for many years, the assassination was the mother of all conspiracy theories. Today it is easy for such things to find fertile ground on the internet, but in the digital before times the Kennedy assassination practically sparked a cottage industry of books and related material picking apart the testimony given to the Warren Commission, the timeline of events, each frame of the Zapruder film, the physical evidence, and the backgrounds of all of the involved. It was a big enough deal that the congress put together the Select Committee on Assassinations to look into it and other events in the 60s.
Multiple books, including a few best sellers, were written trying to tease out of establish one theory or another as reality. I have a set of Kennedy Assassination trading cards, with cards featuring a range of alleged co-conspirators and whole careers were made over these things.
Peter Dale Scott coined the term the “Deep State” about an alleged shadow right wing group of people who “really” ran the government. You will hear Donald Trump supporters talk about the “Deep State,” but as with almost everything they say, what they are saying here is an inversion of reality. They don’t want to end it, they want to create the “Deep State” that Peter Dale Scott suggested was the force behind US actions and policy.
Radio host Dave Emory has spent decades digging into the minutiae of the assassination, the deep state, who was involved, and the course of history changed by the event. He has, for example, documented pretty much everybody who was in Dallas immediately before or during the assassination, which includes quite a list including two future Republican presidents. Richard Nixon and George H. W. Bush.
I used to listen to his show every Sunday night on KFJC, one of the local college radio stations, where he would dig into the history of various individuals. I also read many of the books on the topic. It was interesting at the time, and felt harmless enough. I came out the far side of all of that believing that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and that most of the conspiracy theories were attempts to force together independent actions as though some more powerful force… the CIA or the Deep State or whoever… was pulling the strings, that everything ran like clockwork to somebody’s master plan.
The problem is that reality isn’t a heist movie. Ocean’s Eleven is a fantasy. You cannot control that many variable and you cannot keep that many people quiet. The Brinks robbery is closer to reality, a heist by a small, tight group where things went right, the authorities were stumped, and the crew still went to jail because somebody talked before the statute of limitations had passed.
And planning a presidential assassination is many times more complicated than an armored car robbery if it is a giant conspiracy. The simple answer still seems the most likely. But the tales of the second shooter, the real shooter, the puff of smoke on the grassy knoll still feed the conspiracy machine.
Or would feed it if we were not wrapped up in a fairly constant wave of conspiracies and misinformation. I haven’t seen much about Kennedy in the last decade or so. I know Dave Emory carries on with his show, but has locked himself into such a straight jacket of a world view around his own deep state theories that these days Putin and Xi are the good guys, a stance that is difficult to take seriously being rooted in the idea that Nazis and the CIA assassinated the president 60 years ago and that some Ukrainians sided with the Nazis in WWII because they briefly seemed like a better alternative than Stalin.
The assassination has always been “history” to me, something that happened a couple of years before I was born. Unlike my parents, I can’t tell you where I was when I heard the news as I was yet to be conceived. And while I can appreciate the possibility that it represented a diversion of history, or at least of possibility, most of the alleged direct actions were done and gone before I was very old. I was born the day US ground troops were introduced to the war with the Marines landing to defend the air base at Da Nang and can remember the news coverage of the fall of Saigon and Phnom Penh. But they were just images of far away places on the evening news, a flash of color and activity, helicopters flying or a reporter at a roadblock with mortars booming in the background, for a few minutes in the evening during dinner before the stuff I wanted to see came on.
Now, being the age my grandparents were in the 60s… a bit older, actually… I am a little less willing to harbor the fantasy that one person, even one with the power of the president, could uproot the course of history. Somebody had a montage of former president Obama promising every single year of his administration to get the US out of Afghanistan that felt particularly telling. Was he lying? Did his advisors talk him out of it? Was he getting intel, real or fabricated, that stayed his hand? Was it just not a priority, and item on his presidential to-do list that, like a new year’s resolution, he never quite got to?
At my age I have found something disappointing about every politician I have ever seen, supported, or voted for, such that I wonder if the relative youth and vigor and optimism of President Kennedy at his prime was preserved by his early and untimely death. I am not suggesting it was a good thing, not at all. Merely the effect of those being cut off in their prime never having to be seen in decay.
Anyway, thoughts for an anniversary and how things might have been different, but probably not. Maybe my aunt’s poem was the reason that the copy of the paper was really saved.
I’ll text that image to her later today.